Brazilian Climate Litigation Platform

The Brazilian Climate Litigation Platform is a database developed by Research Group on Law, Environment and Justice in the Anthropocene (JUMA) which gathers information on climate litigation in Brazilian courts. For a better understanding of the cases classification, access our methodology and our publications. For information on case updates, visit our news page.
Login
EN



Case Name: ADI 7795 (Brazilian Emissions Trading System and Insurers)

Type of Action

Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI)

Court of origin

Federal Supreme Court of Brazil (STF)

Filing Date

03/2025

Original case number

7795

State of origin

Distrito Federal (DF)

Link to court of origin’s consultation website

https://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=7195552

Summary

This is a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) with a request for a preliminary injunction, filed by the National Confederation of General Insurance, Private Pension and Life, Supplementary Health, and Capitalization Companies (CNseg) seeking a declaration of the unconstitutionality of Article 56 of Federal Law 15.042/2024 (Brazilian Emissions Trading System Law). The disputed article requires insurance companies, open supplementary pension entities, capitalization companies, and local reinsurers to compulsorily acquire carbon credits or investment fund shares in these assets for a minimum of 0.5% per year of their technical reserves and provisions. CNseg argues that the provision has formal and substantive unconstitutionality defects, in the sense that insurers cannot be subject to mandatory investment, due to the provisions of the Complementary Law that regulates the sector. The argument is that the provision restricts freedom, free enterprise, and free competition and requires insurers, even though they are not the largest contributors to GHG emissions, to acquire carbon credits, placing an excessive burden on them for environmental protection. Within this context, the argument is that the credits have an uncertain real value, there is insufficient supply in the domestic market, and that the obligation implies the artificial creation of demand, which could harm insurers and other companies interested in acquiring the assets. As a preliminary injunction, the claim is seeking the immediate suspension of the article. On the merits, the claim is seeking the declaration of unconstitutionality, with ex tunc effects, of Article 56 of Federal Law 15.042/2024.

See more

Plaintiff

  • Confederação Nacional das Empresas de Seguros Gerais, Previdência Privada e Vida, Saúde Suplementar e Capitalização (CNseg)

Type of plaintiff

  • Organized Civil Society

Defendant

  • Congresso Nacional

Type of defendant

  • Legislative Branch

Main norms mobilized

Brazilian biomes

Not Applicable

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission sectors

Not Applicable

Status

Pending

Type of case

Systemic

Climate in environmental licensing

Non-mentioned

Environmental and/or climate justice approach

Non-existent

Claim alignment with climate protection

Not aligned

Measures Addressed

  • Mitigation

Climate approach

Contextual approach


Case timeline

03/2025

Complaint


Case documents


Document type

Complaint

Origin

Confederação Nacional das Empresas de Seguros Gerais, Previdência Privada e Vida, Saúde Suplementar e Capitalização (CNseg)

Date

03/2025

Brief description

The formal and material unconstitutionality of article 56 of Federal Law 15,042/2024 is defended and the request is made that the provision be declared unconstitutional with ex tunc effects.

File available