Type of Action
Civil Public Action (ACP)
Court of origin
Federal Regional Court or Federal Judge
Filing Date
06/2021
Original case number
1015025-39.2021.4.01.3200
State of origin
Amazonas (AM)
Link to court of origin’s consultation website
https://pje1g.trf1.jus.br/consultapublica/ConsultaPublica/listView.seamSummary
This is a Public Civil Action (ACP) filed by the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) against Paulo de Lima Paulo for the deforestation of an area of 146.75 hectares between 2011 and 2018 in Boca do Acre, Amazonas. The MPF alleges that the defendant's occupation of the land was illegal because it is an area within an Agro-extractive Settlement Project (PAE), owned and of interest to the Federal Government, managed by the National Institute for Colonization and Agrarian Reform (INCRA) and occupied by traditional extractive communities. This ACP is part of a set of 22 actions filed by the MPF as a result of the investigation carried out in civil inquiry no. 1.13.000.001719/2015-49, for illegal deforestation carried out within the Antimary Agro-extractive Settlement Project (PAE), but against different defendants. The argument for the action is based, among other points, on Brazilian Environmental Law, regarding the constitutional protection of the environment, the accusation of deforestation, civil liability propter rem for environmental damages, including climate damages, and collective moral damages. It also mentions, as an environmental liability, the unauthorized emissions of Greenhouse Gases (GHG) caused by the illegal deforestation of the area, calculated at 78,938.61 tons of carbon dioxide, which are directly related to the Brazilian State's departure from its climate goals, out of step with national and international commitments assumed by Brazil in the National Policy on Climate Change – PNMC (Federal Law 12.187/2009) and the Paris Agreement (promulgated by Federal Decree 9.073/2017). Among other requests, the following is sought: (i) reparation for the damages caused by the illegal deforestation; (ii) payment of compensation corresponding to intermediate and residual environmental material damages; (iv) payment of compensation corresponding to climate damages; and (v) payment of compensation corresponding to collective moral damages.
Subsequently, INCRA was included in the active party as a co-litigant assistant to the plaintiff.
A judgment was issued recognizing the relationship between deforestation and climate change, presenting extensive arguments on climate change and civil liability for climate damage, acknowledging said damage in the case. The requests were partially granted, condemning the defendant: a) to fulfill the obligation to restore the degraded area according to the Degraded Area Recovery Plan (PRAD); b) to the obligation not to act, consisting of a prohibition on the use of the area by the defendant, in order to allow natural regeneration; c) to pay compensation for material damages related to interim and residual environmental damages, the value of which will be subject to settlement of judgment; d) to pay compensation for climate damages caused by deforestation, in the amount of R$ 1,957,677.57, using as a basis for calculating the amount of carbon emitted the Technical Note prepared by the Amazon Research Institute (IPAM) and, for pricing purposes, the value of 5 dollars per ton, according to the Amazon Fund; e) to the payment of compensation for collective moral damages, in the amount of 5% of the total material damages determined in the settlement of the judgment. Finally, it declared the respective CAR null and void and allocated all the resources obtained to the Fund for Diffuse Rights.The judgment became final and the case entered the enforcement phase.
Plaintiff
Type of plaintiff
Defendant
Type of defendant
Main norms mobilized
Brazilian biomes
Amazon (tropical forest)Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission sectors
Status
Finally decided
Type of case
Routine case
Climate in environmental licensing
Non-mentioned
Environmental and/or climate justice approach
Non-existent
Claim alignment with climate protection
Aligned
Measures Addressed
Climate approach
Relevant approach
Document type
Decision
Origin
7ª Vara Federal Ambiental e Agrária da SJAM
Date
04/2025
Brief description
It recognizes the climate damage and sentences the defendant to comply with the obligation to restore the degraded area and prohibit its use, to pay compensation for material damages related to interim and residual environmental damages, to pay compensation for climate damages caused by deforestation and to pay compensation for collective moral damages; and, finally, it declares the nullity of the respective CAR and allocates the resources to the Diffuse Rights Fund.
Document type
Complaint
Origin
Ministério Público Federal (MPF)
Date
06/2021
Brief description
Alleges illegal deforestation in a settlement in the Amazon biome and demands compensation for environmental and climate damages, including collective moral damages.